The Life and Death of 127 Film


If you’re not familiar with 127 film, don’t worry, you’re definitely not alone. These days it’s rarely mentioned. However for a brief time in history 127 was the popular kid when it came to film formats.

Pictured: Bencini Comet S via Steve Rainwater on Flickr and the Kodak Vest Pocket camera via David on Flickr

But first, what exactly is it?

Well, 127 film is 46 mm wide, which places it between 35 mm and 120 film in size. Like 120, it’s a paperback film and the cameras that used it produced negatives that were 4x4cm, giving 12 images on a roll, 4x6cm (8 images), or 4x3cm (16 images).

127 film was first created by Kodak in 1912 for their new Vest Pocket Camera (pictured above right). This was a folding camera that, as you can probably guess from the name, would fit comfortably in the vest pocket of the user. For this reason 127 film was also often referred to as Vest Pocket film.

127 film was extremely popular when it was first released due to the portability of the folding cameras that used it. Crucially, it was also affordable.

Some of the earliest folding “vest pocket cameras” included the Zeiss Ikon Kolibri, Zeh Goldi, and of course, the Kodak Vest Pocket.

So well made were these cameras that many of them are still in working condition today and can be found at a cheap price. If you do manage to get your hands on one of these Vest Pocket Cameras, you may also be surprised at just how genuinely compact they are. A piece of technology over a century old may not always be the easiest to use, but when you do get a decent image out of them it’s certainly satisfying. Just check out the pictures below!

Photos by @nykonartist using the Kodak Vest Pocket Model B and @almosthasselblad using the Zeiss Ikon Kolibri.

Despite it's initial popularity, when 35 mm film was introduced in the 1930s with its smaller size and greater number of exposures, 127 film fell out of favor.

But then in the 1950s 127 film experienced a revival with the release of many cheap and easy to use cameras such as the Kodak Brownie 127. Three models of the Brownie were produced between 1952 to 1967 and they were some of the earliest plastic cameras ever made. These cameras were geared towards simplicity and ease of use, with a fixed aperture and shutter speed.

Photos by @maximalanders using the Kodak Brownie.

Imperial was another camera brand that made many of these cameras similar to the Kodak Brownie, with plastic lenses and fixed apertures, the most well known being the Imperial Satellite.

There were also more advanced and high-end twin lens reflex cameras that produced 4x4 exposures like the Rolleiflex Baby (or “Baby Grey”) as well as the Yashica-44.

Other 127 cameras from this time include the Kowa Komaflex-S and Ricoh Super 44.

Top left: @oleman with the Yashica-44. Bottom left: @kashmir2209 with the Yashica-44. Top right: @kangiha with the Yashica-44. Middle right: @kashmir2209 with the Yashica-44. Bottom right: @mapix with the Rolleiflex 4x4 baby grey

During this period 127 film was also made available in color slide emulsions, and the resulting 2 inch square transparencies were known as “Superslides.” They could be projected in a normal projector designed for 24x36 mm slides.

Kodak eventually stopped producing 127 film in 1995. For those wanting to shoot 127 film these days there are just a few available options left. The only commercially available 127 film is Rerapan, in black and white, as well as color slide film. Aside from this there’s of course discontinued and expired 127 films that can be found online such as Agfa Isopan, Efke R100, and Ilford FP4+. (It’s also possible to cut your own 127 film from 120, but that’s a tipster for another time.)

When it comes to development, most professional labs should be able to develop and scan 127 film on request, though they will likely charge a higher price for doing so. Developing at home is also simple. Just make sure you have a film reel that is adjustable for 127 format.

Credits: johbeil & kangiha

Perhaps the most exciting thing about the 127 format is that there are still plenty of options when it comes to quirky cameras to shoot with. The lack of available film means these cameras are often overlooked, and they can still be found very cheaply online or at vintage stores and flea markets. Especially those cameras produced in the 50s like the Kodak Brownie.

So what will be the fate of 127 film? One thing we can be sure of is that the film community will never allow it to disappear entirely. We know how much analogue enthusiasts enjoy rising to the challenge of shooting obscure formats. Right now it’s difficult and expensive to get hold of 127 film to shoot, but who knows, that may not always be the case. After all, there are so many 127 cameras lying around in perfect condition, a little dusty, but just waiting for someone to bring them back to life.

Have you ever experimented with an obscure film format? Get in touch to tell us about it or comment below.

Preview image courtesy of David on Flickr.

written by alexgray on 2022-11-20 #gear #culture #127-film #kodak-brownie #film-format #kodak-vest-pocket-camera #yashica-44 #film-history #rolleiflex-baby #tech-junkie


  1. klawe
    klawe ·

    The Rera film spool with paper is good for using three times. I like 135 film for the 2nd and 3rd use (a half 35mm 36 exp. for 16 exp. 4x4)

  2. klawe
    klawe ·

    ...then you get nice sprocket hole, too

  3. jolom
    jolom ·

    Soooo, maybe Lomography should consider producing some 127 films? Hm? ;-)

  4. jolom
    jolom ·

    I use a film slitter to cut 120 film down to 127, which also gives a bonus 16mm piece of film that can be used to re-load 110 cartridges for my 110 cameras!

  5. polaroidlove
    polaroidlove ·

    Wow, great photos. :-)

  6. alexgray
    alexgray ·

    @klawe very cool!

  7. klawe
    klawe ·

    @alexgray Thanks! ...its the same with 17.5mm HIT-format (self made coils and paper with 16mm film).

  8. stereograph
    stereograph ·

    @jolom i would really like to know more about this slitzer and the refill! is there a tipster?

  9. stereograph
    stereograph ·

    @jolom i would really like to know more about this slitter and the refill! is there a tipster?

  10. stereograph
    stereograph ·

    i rally like the 127er format but new ones are way to expensive and rare too!

  11. klawe
    klawe ·

    @stereograph man kann sich einen Slitter selber bauen...…
    ...oder einen für 60€ kaufen:
    Bringt aber beides nicht viel, da man auch die beiden Spulen (46mm alt oder 47,1mm aktuell) und das mit Zahlen beschriftete Rückpapier benötigt.
    Es gibt auch 35mm Film ohne Perforation zum verwursten...

  12. lizkoppert
    lizkoppert ·

    @jolom, I'd be in for supporting Lomography's attempt at 127 film. Some cameras around here that would love some of it.

  13. klawe
    klawe ·

    @lizkoppert I bought some Rollei Crossbird 127 film today for NZ$ 17.60 (10,60 €) per roll. A 100 ASA slide film crossed in C41 200 ASA.
    It won't be cheaper with Lomo either ;-)

  14. lizkoppert
    lizkoppert ·

    @klawe, maybe not, but that's about what I'm paying at Top Shots anyway (when the owner can actually get film IN!). I'm okay with that :)

  15. klawe
    klawe ·

    @lizkoppert I think the LomoChrome Purple would be really interesting in 127 format @lomography

  16. lizkoppert
    lizkoppert ·

    @klawe, heck yes!!!!!!!! I've got a Kodak Brownie 127 that would be PERFECT for that! Please, @lomography, please?

  17. wahiba
    wahiba ·

    So long as one can get hold of a second spool the easiest way to test one out is use 35mm film stuck to 127 backing, or cut down 120 backing. Of course if you are lucky enough to have a 127 with a good lens then I reckon cutting down 120 to 127 is a worthwhile option.

  18. nykonartist
    nykonartist ·

    Thank you for including my Kodak Model B shot. I worked hard to replace the bellows on that camera. I've made a jig that can cut 120 film down to 127 and I reroll it onto used 127 paper and spools. You can also roll 35mm onto 127 paper. I very much enjoy this format and love using the Model B and enjoy processing vintage Kodak Verichrome which is surprisingly robust.

  19. jolom
    jolom ·

    @stereograph I bought my film slitter from a seller on Etsy. It works well.…

    For refilling 110 cartridges, there are instructions here:

  20. sonvisen
    sonvisen ·

    I rolled ordinary black and white film with used 127 backing paper on to a 127 reel. I put it in my Kodak Brownie 127 - and had a really fun day out. It is a bit fidly, but anyone can do it. One tip: If you come over some old 127 film - don't throw away backing paper or reels. Keep it and use it, again and again. Some sample shots:…………

  21. bgw1957
    bgw1957 ·

    One of my early collecting obsessions was all the Kodak Brownies with “Star” in the name. Flex, flash, meter, mite, let, mite ii. I loved mounting my own super slides. Please consider doing for 127 what you have done for 110!

  22. klawe
    klawe ·

    @bgw1957 As long as the 127 format is still available (Rera, Rollei, Shanghai GP3...), it would be good to have the Lomochrome films in 127 format.

  23. thegreatgasmaskman
    thegreatgasmaskman ·

    well, Rollei Crossbird was available in 127 for a while, and there's also Shanghai GP3. I've also heard Ferrania is working to make 127 film as well.

  24. materiagrezza
    materiagrezza ·

    @thegreatgasmaskman Maco still has 127 Crossbird afaik, and it's as expensive as ever. But I've developed it E6, it was worth every shot.

  25. materiagrezza
    materiagrezza ·

    @klawe Me too, I would totally support Lomo making Lomochrome films in 127. Maybe next July 12, which is 127 day? I'm willing to wait ages till we have news...or respool 35mm like the olden days.

  26. klawe
    klawe ·

    @materiagrezza 😃 👍

  27. thegreatgasmaskman
    thegreatgasmaskman ·

    @materiagrezza thanks- I'll have to check it out. I definitely enjoyed Crossbird.

More Interesting Articles